BANNON et al v. BOYLE TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, LLC et al
MELISSA Q. BANNON and THOMAS MURPHY |
BOYLE TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, LLC, BOYLE BROTHERS, INC., TROY S. MCLEAN and JOHN DOE, INC. |
5:2022cv01841 |
May 12, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
JOHN M GALLAGHER |
P.I.: Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal- Property Damage |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO STRIKE (ECF NO. 2), IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN M. GALLAGHER ON 6/3/22.6/3/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(er) |
Filing 4 RESPONSE in Opposition re #2 MOTION to Strike Punitive Damages filed by MELISSA Q. BANNON. (BAER, FRANK) |
Filing 3 Original Record together with certified copy of docket entries received from Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. (md) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Strike Punitive Damages filed by BOYLE BROTHERS, INC., BOYLE TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, LLC, TROY S. MCLEAN.Brief and Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(BUCHANICO, JOANNA) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by JOHN DOE, INC., BOYLE BROTHERS, INC., BOYLE TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, LLC, TROY S. McLean (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15916179), filed by JOHN DOE, INC., BOYLE BROTHERS, INC., BOYLE TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, LLC, TROY S. McLean. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(BUCHANICO, JOANNA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.