CHETTY v. BARTO
LEE A. CHETTY |
DAN C. BARTO |
5:2022cv01935 |
May 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO |
GERALD J PAPPERT |
Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Mailed doc. 6 to pro se. (er) |
Filing 11 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S #9 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 6/22/22.6/22/22 ENTERED AND MAILED TO CHETTY.(fdc) |
Filing 10 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by LEE A. CHETTY. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(er) |
Filing 9 APPLICATION FOR PRISONERS TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS filed by LEE A. CHETTY.(ENVELOPE ATTACHED).(er) |
Memorandum and Order (7 & 8) mailed to Chetty. (fdc) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED PURSUANT TO 28 USC SEC. 1915. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED IN PART WITH PREJUDICE AND DISMISSED IN PART WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 6/7/22. 6/7/22 ENTERED. NOT MAILED TO CHETTY. (fdc) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 6/7/22. 6/7/22 ENTERED. NOT MAILED TO CHETTY. (fdc) |
Memorandum and Order (7 & 8) E-mailed to Superintendent of SCI Frackville. (fdc) |
Filing 6 ORDER THAT THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE IS REASSIGNED FROM THE CALENDAR OF THE HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT TO THE CALENDAR OF THE HONORABLENITZA I. QUINONES ALEJANDRO, AS RELATED TO CHETTY V. SARDELLA CIVIL NO. 22-1549. SIGNED BY CLERK OF COURT KATE BARKMAN, CLERK OF COURT ON 6/3/22. 6/3/22 ENTERED AND COPIES (NOT MAILED TO PRO SE). (er) |
Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by LEE A. CHETTY. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(mas) |
Filing 4 Declaration in Support of Motion TP Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by LEE A. CHETTY. envelope included. (Attachments: #1 envelope) (mas) Modified on 6/1/2022 (mas). |
Filing 3 ORDER THAT IF CHETTY SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION HE MUST, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER PAY $402 TO THE CLERK OF COURT, OR FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 5/19/22. 5/19/22 ENTERED AND COPY OF ORDER AND PRISONER IFP FORM MAILED TO CHETTY.(fdc) |
Copy of Doc. 2 mailed to Pro Se. (mas) |
Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (er) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DAN C. BARTO, filed by LEE A. CHETTY (FEE - NOT PAID - IFP NOT FILED). (ENVELOPE ATTACHED). (er) (Main Document 1 replaced on 5/18/2022) (er). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: CHETTY v. BARTO | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: LEE A. CHETTY | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: DAN C. BARTO | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.