JAMOH v. Ude
BASHIR YUSUF JAMOH |
Jackson Ude |
5:2022cv03070 |
August 3, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
JOHN M GALLAGHER |
P.I.: Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER THAT THE #3 MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN M. GALLAGHER ON 8/19/22.8/19/22 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREP AND E-MAILED.(mas) |
Filing 8 ORDER THAT THE #4 MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN M. GALLAGHER ON 8/19/22.8/19/22 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREP AND E-MAILED.(mas) |
Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Mark S. Gibson, PA State Constable re: served Summons, Complaint, Motions for Admission Pro Hac Vice (2) upon Jackson Ude by Personal on 08/18/2022 (MACEL, JOSHUA) |
Copy of Doc. 6 mailed to Unrep. (mas) |
Filing 6 ORDER OF 8/15/22 THAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COURT'S PROCEDURE FOR RANDOM REASSIGNMENT OF CASES, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE IS REASSIGNED FROM THE HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON JR, TO THE CALENDAR OF THE HONORABLE JOHN M. GALLAGHER FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. SIGNED BY CLERK OF COURT GEORGE WYLESOL ON 8/15/22. 8/15/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (DT) (COPY NOT MAILED TO UNREP PARTY) |
Filing 5 ORDER OF 8/12/22 THAT UPON REVIEW OF THE RECORD, THE COURT HAVING DETERMINED THAT THIS CASE WAS IMPROPERLY DESIGNATED BY PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL AS RELATED TO WABOTE V. UDE, CIVIL ACTION 21-2214 AND SYLVA V. UDE, CIVIL ACTION 21-4102, ETC. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE CLERK SHALL FOLLOW THE COURT'S PROCEDURE FOR RANDOM RE-ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASES. SIGNED BY JUDGE: JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 8/12/22. 8/12/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(dt) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice of David D. Lin ( Filing fee $ 40 receipt number APAEDC-16094682.) filed by BASHIR YUSUF JAMOH.Certificate of Service.(MACEL, JOSHUA) |
Filing 3 First MOTION for Pro Hac Vice of Michael D. Cilento ( Filing fee $ 40 receipt number APAEDC-16090362.) filed by BASHIR YUSUF JAMOH.Certificate of Service.(MACEL, JOSHUA) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Jackson Ude. Forwarded To: Counsel on 8/3/22 (dt) |
Jury Trial Demanded by Plaintiff BASHIR YUSUF JAMOH. (dt) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jackson Ude ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number BPAEDC-16087583.), filed by BASHIR YUSUF JAMOH. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form)(MACEL, JOSHUA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: JAMOH v. Ude | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: BASHIR YUSUF JAMOH | |
Represented By: | JOSHUA DAVID MACEL |
Represented By: | DAVID D. LIN |
Represented By: | MICHAEL D. CILENTO, I |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Jackson Ude | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.