CHILDS v. STEBERGER et al
| MAURICE CHILDS |
| CHERYL STEBERGER, DORINDA HOWARD, HOWARD KNISELY, DAVID MILLER and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LANCASTER COUNTY |
| 5:2022cv03320 |
| August 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| MITCHELL S GOLDBERG |
| LYNNE A SITARSKI |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Receipt of State Court Record on 10/11/22, sent from Clerk's Office to Chambers of Judge Sitarski. (va) |
| State Court Record received. (JL) |
| Filing 7 Response In Opposition to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LANCASTER COUNTY. (Attachments: #1 Appendix) (GONZALEZ, ANDREW) |
| DOC. NO. 6 MAILED TO PRO SE CHILDS ON 9/12/2022. (md) |
Filing 6
ORDER THAT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LANCASTER COUNTY SHALL FILE SPECIFIC AND DETAILED ANSWERS BY OCTOBER 24, 2022, PURSUANT TO RULE 5, 28 U.S.C. 2254. AS REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. 3771(B)(2), THE COMMONWEALTH IS FURTHER ORDERED TO ENSURE THAT IN A FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF A STATE CONVICTION, ANY CRIME VICTIMS ARE AFFORDED THEIR RIGHTS UNDER THE CRIMES VICTIMS ACT, AS AMENDED DECEMBER 1, 2009. SHOULD PETITIONER WISH TO FILE A REPLY TO THE RESPONDENT'S ANSWER, HIS REPLY SHALL BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER SERVICE OF THE ANSWER. THE PROTHONOTARY OF LANCASTER/CLERK OF COURTS OR OFFICE OF JUDICIAL SUPPORT OF LANCASTER COUNTY SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK OF THIS COURT COPIES OF ALL RECORDS, INCLUDING TRANSCRIPTS OF NOTES OF TESTIMONY AT ARRAIGNMENT, TRIAL, SENTENCING, SUPPRESSION HEARINGS, POST CONVICTION HEARINGS, PETITIONS, PLEADINGS, OPINIONS AND BRIEFS OF STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF COMMONWEALTH V. MAURICE DESHAWN CHILDS, CP-36-CR-0001561-2022, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA BY OCTOBER 24, 2022. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI ON 9/8/22. 9/8/22 ENTERED. PRO SE PETITIONER NOT MAILED. (va)
|
| Copy of #6 Order e-mailed to Lancaster County DA & PA Atty Gen and Faxed to Lancaster Clerk's Office on 9/9/22. (va) |
| Doc. 5 mailed to pro se. (er) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER THAT #1 LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE LYNNE A. SITARSKI, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. PURSUANT TO LOCAL CIVIL RULE 72.1.IV(C), ALL ISSUES AND EVIDENCE SHALL BE PRESENTED TO THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND NEW ISSUES AND EVIDENCE SHALL NOT BE RAISED AFTER THE FILING OF THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IF THEY COULD HAVE BEEN PRESENTED TO THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO PROVIDE THE LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND THE PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 9/7/22. 9/7/22 ENTERED. PRO SE PETITIONER NOT MAILED. (va) Modified on 9/7/2022 (va).
|
| Copy of #5 Order & #1 Petition e-mailed to Lancaster DA & PA Atty Gen on 9/7/22. (va) |
| Filing 4 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (mas) |
| Copy of Doc. 4 mailed to Pro Se. (mas) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by MAURICE CHILDS. (mas) |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by MAURICE CHILDS. ENVELOPE INCLUDED. (mas) |
| Filing 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS FILED BY MAURICE CHILDS.ENVELOPE INCLUDED.(mas) Modified on 8/22/2022 (mas). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
