LLOYD v. BEST BUY/CBNA et al
| SUSAN LLOYD |
| BEST BUY/CBNA and RAS LAVRAR |
| 5:2022cv04071 |
| October 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOSEPH F LEESON |
| JEFFREY L SCHMEHL |
| Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER THAT COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF[S] MUST SERVE THIS ORDER ON EVERY PARTY TO THIS CASE IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE PARTYS FIRST APPEARANCE, UNLESS THIS CASE WAS REMOVED FROM STATE COURT, IN WHICH CASE THIS RESPONSIBILITY FALLS ON COUNSEL FOR THE PARTY WHO REMOVED THE CASE; ETC. AS HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 10/13/22. 10/13/22 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(mas)
|
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 by BEST BUY/CBNA.(FAUSEY, MICHAEL) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (sbt) |
| Attorneys are required by local rule to complete and file both a Civil Cover Sheet and a Designation Form. Defendant's counsel is directed to file Designation Form in this case using the Exhibit docket event. (sbt) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Best Buy/CBNA (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16238636), filed by Best Buy/CBNA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(FAUSEY, MICHAEL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
