POPOTE v. ESTOCK et al
| RAFAEL MUESES POPOTE |
| SUPERINTENDENT LEE ESTOCK, JOSH SHAPIRO, JOHN T. ADAMS and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BERKS COUNTY |
| 5:2022cv04773 |
| December 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOEL H SLOMSKY |
| CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER THAT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BERKS COUNTY IS ADDED AS A PARTY RESPONDENT AND THE CAPTION IS HEREBY AMENDED. RESPONDENT SHALL FILE AN ANSWER TO THE HABEAS CORPUS PETITION ON OR BEFORE 2/26/23; ETC.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS ON 1/12/23. 1/12/23 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL)
|
| Filing 3 Praecipe to enter appearance with certificate of service by JOHN T. ADAMS. (KELECIC, KENNETH) Modified on 1/11/2023 (tjd). |
|
Filing 2
ORDER THAT THE ABOVE CAPTIONED IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 12/27/22. 12/28/22 ENTERED AND E-MAILED, EMIALED TO BCDAO AND POAG.(JL)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number APAEDC-16343790.), filed by RAFAEL MUESES POPOTE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form)(STURM, CHERYL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
