FANNING v. JOSEPH LEVINE & SON, INC. et al
| CLARENCE FANNING, DILLON OWAD, HUNTER MITCHELL and Raymond Bowman |
| JOSEPH LEVINE & SON, INC., JOSEPH LEVINE & SON MEMORIAL CHAPEL, INC., HAYM SALOMON MEMORIAL PARK and ADAM LEVINE |
| 5:2022cv04873 |
| December 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOHN M GALLAGHER |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT Second Amended Complaint against All Defendants All Defendants., filed by CLARENCE FANNING. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(RYAN, M.) |
| Filing 10 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 by JOSEPH LEVINE & SON MEMORIAL CHAPEL, INC..(ANDRISANO, ANTHONY) |
| Filing 9 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 by JOSEPH LEVINE & SON, INC..(ANDRISANO, ANTHONY) |
Filing 8
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT IS TO FILE ITS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. THIS ORDER ALSO SERVES AS A REMINDER TO THE PARTIES OF THEIR CONTINUING OBLIGATION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 7.1(B)(2) TO PROMPTLY FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT OF ANY CHANGES TO THE INFORMATION REQUIRED BY FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 7.1(A). SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN M. GALLAGHER ON 1/20/23. 1/20/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas) Modified on 1/23/2023 (tjd).
|
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against HAYM SALOMON MEMORIAL PARK, JOSEPH LEVINE & SON MEMORIAL CHAPEL, INC., JOSEPH LEVINE & SON, INC., ADAM LEVINE, filed by CLARENCE FANNING, DILLON OWAD, HUNTER MITCHELL, Raymond Bowman. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(RYAN, M.) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Samantha Wolfe on behalf of HAYM SALOMON MEMORIAL PARK, JOSEPH LEVINE & SON MEMORIAL CHAPEL, INC., JOSEPH LEVINE & SON, INC., ADAM LEVINE with Certificate of Service(Wolfe, Samantha) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by ANTHONY F. ANDRISANO, JR on behalf of HAYM SALOMON MEMORIAL PARK, JOSEPH LEVINE & SON MEMORIAL CHAPEL, INC., JOSEPH LEVINE & SON, INC., ADAM LEVINE with Certificate of Service(ANDRISANO, ANTHONY) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by ADAM LEVINE, JOSEPH LEVINE & SON, INC., HAYM SALOMON MEMORIAL PARK, JOSEPH LEVINE & SON MEMORIAL CHAPEL, INC.. All Defendants. (ANDRISANO, ANTHONY) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by CLARENCE FANNING Revised Designation Form (RYAN, M.) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to HAYM SALOMON MEMORIAL PARK, JOSEPH LEVINE & SON MEMORIAL CHAPEL, INC., JOSEPH LEVINE & SON, INC., ADAM LEVINE. Forwarded To: EMAILED TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL on 12/8/22 (JL) |
| Attorneys are required by local rule to complete and file both a Civil Cover Sheet and a Designation Form. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to file COMPLETED Designation Form in this case using the Notice (Other) docket event located in the Notices category. Related Case section is incomplete. The Yes/No questions have to be answered. (sbt) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by CLARENCE FANNING, HUNTER MITCHELL, DILLON OWAD. (JL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against HAYM SALOMON MEMORIAL PARK, JOSEPH LEVINE & SON MEMORIAL CHAPEL, INC., JOSEPH LEVINE & SON, INC., ADAM LEVINE ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16358420.), filed by CLARENCE FANNING, DILLON OWAD, HUNTER MITCHELL. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form)(RYAN, M.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
