GANDHI v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
| RAJINDER GANDHI |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 5:2023cv00277 |
| January 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| PAMELA A CARLOS |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Procedural Order together with Supplemental Orders 3/10/23 Entered and copies e-mailed. (mas) |
Filing 10
ORDER THAT (DOC. #6 AND #8 ) LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SERVE THE SUMMONSES AND THE COMPLAINT IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(I) BY ELECTRONIC MEANS VIA THE COURTS CASE MANAGEMENT/ELECTRONIC CASE FILES SYSTEM (CM/ECF), UPON: THE OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL CHIEF COUNSEL, REGION III, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA; AND THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL. THE CLERKS OFFICE WILL ENSURE THAT CM/ECF NOTIFICATIONS INDICATING THAT THE COMPLAINT HAS BEEN FILED, AND SUMMONSES HAVE BEEN ISSUED, ARE SENT TO THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS OFFICE AND THE OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAMELA A. CARLOS ON 3/10/23.3/10/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF IS DEEMED TO HAVE CONSENTED TO THE JURISDICTION OF A MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND THE ASSIGNED MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILL EXERCISE JURISDICTION FOR ALL PURPOSES UNDER 28 U.S.C. 636(C). SEE ROELL V. WITHROW, 538 U.S. 580 (2003). SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAMELA A. CARLOS ON 3/10/23. 3/10/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas)
|
| Service made electronically as to the Commissioner of Social Security and the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. (mas) |
| Filing 8 APPLICATION OF PRO SE PLAINTIFF RAJINDER NATH GANDHI TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS. (ENVELOPE ATTACHED)(dt) (Main Document 8 replaced on 2/28/2023) (dt). |
|
Filing 7
ORDER OF 2/21/23 THAT THE COURT HAVING SERVED NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF DIRECTING THE PLAINTIFF TO FILE THE CONSENT TO OR DECLINATION OF JURISDICTION OF A MAGISTRATE JUDGE FORM ("THE FORM") WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THE NOTICE (ECF NO. 3); AND PLAINTIFF HAVING FAILED TO FILE THE FORM, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE PLAINTIFF SHALL THE FORM WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. FAILURE TO COMPLETE AND FILE THE FORM AS ORDERED HEREIN SHALL BE DEEMED CONSENT TO THE JURISDICTION OF A MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND THE ASSIGNED MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILL EXERCISE JURISDICTION FOR ALL PURPOSES UNDER 28 U.S.D. 636(c) ETC. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: PAMELA A. CARLOS ON 2/21/23. 2/21/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (DT) (Attachments: #1 CONSTENT TO PROCEED TO MAGISTRATE)
|
| Filing 6 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS FILED BY RAJINDER GANDHI. ENVELOPE INCLUDED. (mas) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF 1/25/23 THAT PLAINTIFF HAVING FILED A COMPLAINT WITH THE COURT WITHOUT EITHER PAYING THE FEES TO COMMENCE A CIVIL ACTION OR FILING A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: IF PLAINTIFF SEEKS TO PROCEED WITH THIS CASE, PLAINTIFF, MUST WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, EITHER (1) PAY $402.00 FILING FEE OR (2) FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE PLAINTFF WITH AN APPROPRIATE NON-PRISONER APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, BEARING THE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER ON THIS CASE. PLAINTIFF MAY USE THIS FORM TO SEEK LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IF PLAINTIFF CANNOT AFFORD TO PAY THE FEES TO COMMENCE THIS CASE. ETC. IF PLAINTIFF FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, THIS CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: PAMELA A. CARLOS ON 1/25/23. 1/25/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (DT)(IFP APPLICATION MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF RAJINDER GANDHI)
|
| IFP Application and a Copy of Document 5 Mailed to Pro se Plaintiff: RAJINDER GANDHI. (DT) |
| Filing 4 Instructions, Request for appointment of attorney and protocol mailed to pro se plaintiff. (dt) |
| Filing 3 Social Security Notice of Case Assignment (Attachments: #1 CONSENT TO PROCEED TO MAGISTRATE)(dt) Modified on 1/24/2023 (dt). |
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (dt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, filed by RAJINDER GANDHI. (NO IFP OR FILING FEE) (ENVELOPE ATTACHED)(dt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: GANDHI v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: RAJINDER GANDHI | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
