RAKERS v. ROTHFUS
BRITTANY RAKERS |
KATHLEEN ROTHFUS and KATHLEEN H. ROTHFUS |
5:2023cv00784 |
February 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
JEFFREY L SCHMEHL |
P.I.: Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Christopher Leppler re: served Complaint upon Kathleen Rothfus by Personally on 3/27/23 (ZERVANOS, JOHN) |
Filing 9 Disclosure with Certificate of Service by BRITTANY RAKERS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(ZERVANOS, JOHN) |
Filing 8 Disclosure with Certificate of Service by KATHLEEN H. ROTHFUS.(SCHWARTZ, SETH) |
|
|
|
Filing 4 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint together with With Affirmative Defenses by KATHLEEN H. ROTHFUS. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(SCHWARTZ, SETH) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by SETH J. SCHWARTZ on behalf of KATHLEEN H. ROTHFUS with Jury Demand (Attachments: #1 Demand for Jury Trial)(SCHWARTZ, SETH) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to KATHLEEN H. ROTHFUS. Forwarded To: Counsel on 2/28/23 (er) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KATHLEEN ROTHFUS ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16530062.), filed by BRITTANY RAKERS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form Designation Form)(ZERVANOS, JOHN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.