DOE v. FRANKLIN AND MARSHALL COLLEGE
| JOHN DOE |
| FRANKLIN AND MARSHALL COLLEGE |
| 5:2023cv00943 |
| March 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOSEPH F LEESON |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
NOTICE of Appearance by FANTA FREEMAN on behalf of FRANKLIN AND MARSHALL COLLEGE with Certificate of Service(FREEMAN, FANTA)
|
|
Filing 15
NOTICE of Appearance by JOSHUA W.B. RICHARDS on behalf of FRANKLIN AND MARSHALL COLLEGE with Certificate of Service(RICHARDS, JOSHUA)
|
|
Filing 14
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by JOHN DOE. FRANKLIN AND MARSHALL COLLEGE waiver sent on 3/28/2023, answer due 5/30/2023. (MILTENBERG, ANDREW)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER THAT THE #10 MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 3/22/23.3/22/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER THAT THE #9 MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 3/22/23.3/22/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER THAT THE #8 MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 3/22/23.3/22/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Stuart Bernstein ( Filing fee $ 40 receipt number APAEDC-16573935.) filed by JOHN DOE.Certificate of Service.(McCONNELL, CARRIE)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Kristen Mohr ( Filing fee $ 40 receipt number APAEDC-16573925.) filed by JOHN DOE.Certificate of Service.(McCONNELL, CARRIE)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice for Andrew Miltenberg ( Filing fee $ 40 receipt number APAEDC-16573641.) filed by JOHN DOE.Certificate of Service.(McCONNELL, CARRIE)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by CARRIE J. McCONNELL on behalf of JOHN DOE with Certificate of Service(McCONNELL, CARRIE)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER THAT COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF[S] MUST SERVE THIS ORDER ON EVERY PARTY TO THIS CASE IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE PARTYS FIRST APPEARANCE, UNLESS THIS CASE WAS REMOVED FROM STATE COURT, IN WHICH CASE THIS RESPONSIBILITY FALLS ON COUNSEL FOR THE PARTY WHO REMOVED THE CASE; ETC. AS HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 3/14/23. 3/14/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER THAT #2 PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE MOTION TO PROCEED UNDER PSEUDONYM IS GRANTED, AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, THAT THE PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER PROHIBITING DEFENDANT FROM PUBLICLY IDENTIFYING PLAINTIFF, IN COURT FILINGS OR OTHERWISE, IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 3/14/23.3/14/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to FRANKLIN AND MARSHALL COLLEGE. Forwarded To: Counsel on 3/13/23 (mas)
|
|
Filing 3
Memorandum in Support of Motion for Protective Order to Proceed in Pseudonym re #2 MOTION for Protective Order to Proceed in Pseudonym filed by JOHN DOE. (McCONNELL, CARRIE)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Protective Order to Proceed in Pseudonym filed by JOHN DOE.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(McCONNELL, CARRIE)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against FRANKLIN & MARHSALL COLLEGE ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number BPAEDC-16554133.), filed by JOHN DOE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form)(McCONNELL, CARRIE)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
