MEDINA v. DET. SAL APRILE et al
WILLIAM OMAR MEDINA |
ALLENTOWN POLICE DEPT, DET. SAL APRILE, SGT. ERIC STAUFFER and DAVE MUSSEL |
5:2023cv01057 |
March 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
MARK A KEARNEY |
Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT against SAL APRILE, ERIC STAUFFER, filed by WILLIAM OMAR MEDINA.(JL) |
Filing 13 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S PRO SE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT IS DENIED AS A MOTION. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SEPARATELY FILE A COPY OF PAGES 3-27 AS AMENDED COMPLAINT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL NOT ISSUE SUMMONSES; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 5/3/23.5/3/23 ENTERED AND MAILED TO PRO SE.(JL) |
Filing 12 WILLIAM OMAR MEDINA MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT AND EXTENSION TO ADD AND REASSERT EXHIBITS..(JL) |
PAPER #11 MAILED TO PRO SE (JL) |
Filing 11 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ADD EXHIBITS IS DENIED AS MOOT WITHOUT PREJUDICE; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 4/11/23.4/11/23 ENTERED AND NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(JL) |
Filing 10 WILLIAM OMAR MEDINA MOTION TO ADD EXHIBITS OF FALSE DOCUMENTS BY ALLENTOWN POLICE ERIC STAUFFER..(JL) |
COPY OF DOC. NOS. 7 AND 8 HAVE BEEN MAILED TO PRO SE. (bw) |
Filing 9 PLAINTIFF'S INCOMPLETE 285 FORMS SENT IN (JL) |
Filing 8 ORDER THAT THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS TO HIS CLAIMS AGAINST THE ALLENTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT, AGAINST THE OFFICERS IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES, AGAINST THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAVE MUSSEL. WE DISMISS THE ALLENTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT AND DAVE MUSSEL. WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO THE REMAINING CLAIMS AGAINST SERGEANT STAUFFER AND OFFICER APRILE WITH LEAVE FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT AGAINST THEM IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES BY NO LATER THAN 5/2/23. WE AMEND THE CAPTION MOVING FORWARD AS FOLLOWS: WILLIAM OMAR MEDINA VS DET. SAL APRILE; SGT ERIC STAUFFER. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL NOT ISSUE SUMMONS UNTIL FURTHER ORDER IF WARRANTED AFTER SCREENING OF AN AMENDED COMPLAINT; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 3/31/23. 4/3/23 ENTERED AND NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(JL) Modified on 4/3/2023 (tjd). |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 3/31/23. 3/31/23 ENTERED AND NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(JL) |
Document #4 Mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff William Omar Medina. (DT) |
Filing 6 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. WILLIAM OMAR MEDINA, INMATE NUMBER 73276 SHALL PAY THE FILING FEE OF $350 IN INSTALLMENTS. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL NOT ISSUE SUMMONSES SUBJECT TO FURTHER ORDER AFTER SCREENING THE COMPLAINT; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 3/17/23.3/20/23 ENTERED AND NOT MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED TO WARDEN LEHIGH COUNTY.(JL) |
Filing 5 Request for Waiver of Service by WILLIAM OMAR MEDINA. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dt) |
Filing 4 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES.(dt) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against ALLENTOWN POLICE DEPT, SAL APRILE, DAVE MUSSEL, ERIC STAUFFER, filed by WILLIAM OMAR MEDINA.(dt) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/17/2023: #1 EXHIBIT) (dt). (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/17/2023: #2 ENVELOPE) (dt). |
Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by WILLIAM OMAR MEDINA. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dt) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION OF PRO SE PLAINTIFF WILLIAM MEDINA TO PROCEED INFORMA PAUPERIS. (DT) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.