UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SURETEC INSURANCE COMPANY et al
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the use and benefit of GAVER INDUSTRIES, INC. dba BARKER & BARKER PAVING and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF GAVER INDUSTRIES, INC. doing business as BARKER & BARKER PAVING |
CROMEDY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY |
SURETEC INSURANCE COMPANY |
5:2023cv01546 |
April 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
JOHN M GALLAGHER |
Contract: Miller Act |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA re #1 Complaint (Attorney), Designation Form (Fina, Katharine) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA re Attorney Required Forms, Civil Cover Sheet (Fina, Katharine) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to CROMEDY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, SURETEC INSURANCE COMPANY. Forwarded To: Counsel on 4/24/23 (er) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CROMEDY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, SURETEC INSURANCE COMPANY ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16644838.), filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the use and benefit of GAVER INDUSTRIES, INC. dba BARKER & BARKER PAVING. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fina, Katharine) (Attachment 1 replaced on 4/24/2023) (sbt). |
Attorneys are required by local rule to complete and file both a Civil Cover Sheet and a Designation Form. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to file COMPLETED CIVIL COVER SHEET AND DESIGNATION FORM in this case using the Notice (Other) docket event located in the Notices category. Cover Sheet is missing a signature. Designation Form is missing. (sbt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SURETEC INSURANCE COMPANY et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the use and benefit of GAVER INDUSTRIES, INC. dba BARKER & BARKER PAVING | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF GAVER INDUSTRIES, INC. doing business as BARKER & BARKER PAVING | |
Represented By: | Katharine Ann Fina |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Nominal defendant: SURETEC INSURANCE COMPANY | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: CROMEDY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.