WASHINGTON v. YATRON et al
| ALVIN WASHINGTON |
| PAUL M. YATRON and A.D.A. LEAH ROTENBERG |
| 5:2023cv02108 |
| May 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JUAN R SANCHEZ |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE COURTS ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 7/27/23. 7/27/23 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE. (amas)
|
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 7/27/23. 7/27/23 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE. (amas) |
| PAPER #4 MAILED TO PRO SE (JL) |
| Filing 4 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES.(DT) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by ALVIN WASHINGTON. (ENVLOPE ATTACHED)(dt) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against LEAH ROTENBERG, PAUL M. YATRON, filed by ALVIN WASHINGTON. (ENVELOPE ATTACHED) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(dt) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BY PRO SE PLAINTIFF ALVIN WASHINGTON.CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE. (ENVELOPE ATTACHED)(dt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
