STARRY v. TE CONNECTIVITY CORPORATION
Plaintiff: JOHN DAVID STARRY
Defendant: TE CONNECTIVITY CORPORATION and TE CONNECTIVITY, LTD.
Case Number: 5:2023cv02237
Filed: June 12, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: JOHN M GALLAGHER
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER OF 8/2/23 THAT THE DEFENDANT TE CONNECTIVITY, CORPORATION WILL ANSWER, PLEAD, OR OTHERWISE MOVE IN RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE AUGUST 14, 2023. SIGNED BY JUDGE: JOHN M. GALLAGHER ON 8/2/23. 8/3/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (DT)
July 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF 7/7/23 THAT DEFENDANT TE CONNECTIVITY CORPORATION WILL ANSWER, PLEAD OR OTHERWISE MOVE IN RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE AUGUST 7, 2023. SIGNED BY JUDGE: JOHN M. GALLAGHER ON 7/7/23. 7/7/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (DT)
June 16, 2023 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by JOHN DAVID STARRY re: Christi Albert served Summons and Complaint upon TE CONNECTIVITY CORPORATION by service of corporation - person in charge. TE CONNECTIVITY CORPORATION served on 6/15/2023, answer due 7/6/2023. (ABRAMSON, ANDREW)
June 12, 2023 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to TE CONNECTIVITY CORPORATION. Forwarded To: Counsel on 6/12/23 (dt)
June 12, 2023 Filing 2 AMENDED DOCUMENT by JOHN DAVID STARRY. Amendment to Attorney Required Forms, #1 Complaint (Attorney), (Amended Designation Form as per docket no.2). (ABRAMSON, ANDREW)
June 12, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TE CONNECTIVITY CORPORATION ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16747523.), filed by JOHN DAVID STARRY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Case Management Track Form, #3 Designation Form)(ABRAMSON, ANDREW)
June 12, 2023 Attorneys are required by local rule to complete and file both a Civil Cover Sheet and a Designation Form. PLAINTIFF's counsel is directed to file COMPLETED DESIGNATION FORM in this case using the Notice (Other) docket event located in the Notices category. Related Case section is incomplete. The question asking if the case is/is not related needs to be answered. (sbt)
June 12, 2023 Jury Trial Demanded by Plaintiff JOHN DAVID STARRY. (DT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: STARRY v. TE CONNECTIVITY CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TE CONNECTIVITY CORPORATION
Represented By: BRIAN D. LEE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TE CONNECTIVITY, LTD.
Represented By: BRIAN D. LEE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOHN DAVID STARRY
Represented By: ANDREW S. ABRAMSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?