STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO v. UGI UTILITIES INC. et al
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO |
UGI UTILITIES INC. and R.M. PALMER COMPANY |
5:2023cv03008 |
August 4, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
JEFFREY L SCHMEHL |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO re: Eric Diaz served Summons and Complaint upon R.M. PALMER COMPANY by Personal. R.M. PALMER COMPANY served on 8/8/2023, answer due 8/29/2023. (DE LUCA, DANIEL) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO (Attachments: #1 Designation Form)(DE LUCA, DANIEL) |
Attorneys are required by local rule to complete and file both a Civil Cover Sheet and a Designation Form. PLAINTIFF's counsel is directed to file COMPLETED CIVIL COVER SHEET in this case using the Notice (Other) docket event located in the Notices category. Signature is missing. (sbt) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to R.M. PALMER COMPANY, UGI UTILITIES INC.. Forwarded To: Counsel on 08/07/23 (dt) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against R.M. PALMER COMPANY, UGI UTILITIES INC. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16860325.), filed by STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO.(DE LUCA, DANIEL) (Main Document 1 replaced on 8/7/2023) (sbt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.