MUTHARD v. PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD et al
| NICOLE MUTHARD |
| PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD, SEAN YINGLING and JOSEPH PUHALLA |
| 5:2023cv03387 |
| August 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| EDWARD G SMITH |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by NICOLE MUTHARD re: Gary Winfrey served Summons and Complaint upon PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD, JOSEPH PUHALLA, SEAN YINGLING. PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD served on 10/23/2023, answer due 11/13/2023; JOSEPH PUHALLA served on 10/23/2023, answer due 11/13/2023; SEAN YINGLING served on 10/23/2023, answer due 11/13/2023. (KARPF, ARI)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD, JOSEPH PUHALLA, SEAN YINGLING. Forwarded To: Counsel on 8/31/23 (DT)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by SAMANTHA P. MARTIN on behalf of NICOLE MUTHARD (MARTIN, SAMANTHA)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by W. CHARLES SIPIO on behalf of NICOLE MUTHARD (SIPIO, W.)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD, JOSEPH PUHALLA, SEAN YINGLING ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16913080.), filed by NICOLE MUTHARD.(KARPF, ARI)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
