FISHER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY et al
| JAMES FISHER |
| COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and POLICE |
| 5:2023cv03411 |
| August 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| KAI N SCOTT |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 REQUEST TO BE KNOWN AS MR. MCGOO by JAMES FISHER. (PERSONALLY DELIVERED). (er) |
| Filing 10 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by JAMES FISHER. EXHIBIT. (PERSONALLY DELIVERED).(er) |
| Filing 9 EXHIBIT filed by JAMES FISHER. (mas) |
| Filing 8 MOTION TO LOCK TITLE FILED BY JAMES FISHER. (mas) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Disqualify filed by JAMES FISHER.(md) |
| Filing 6 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (mas) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by JAMES FISHER.(mas) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by JAMES FISHER. (mas) |
| Filing 3 Social Security Declining Magistrate Consent filed by JAMES FISHER. (mas) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, POLICE, filed by JAMES FISHER. IFP filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(mas) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by JAMES FISHER.(mas) (Main Document 1 replaced on 9/1/2023) (md). |
| Copy of Doc. 6 and Pro Se E-notice consent form mailed to Pro Se. (mas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
