WARRICK v. JOHNSON et al
| BENJAMIN L. WARRICK, JR. |
| JAYME LYNN JOHNSON, D.R.S. AGENCY, RACHEL KERPER, LOUIS RIZZUTO, NINE M HENNE, SCOTT E LASH, SUPPORT MASTER RACHEAL KERPER, HEARING OFFICER LOUIS R. RIZZUTO, NINE M. HENNE and HON. SCOTT E. LASH |
| 5:2023cv03699 |
| September 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOHN M GALLAGHER |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by SCOTT E. LASH. SCOTT E. LASH waiver sent on 10/31/2023, answer due 1/1/2024. (HERRMANN, JENNIFER) |
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by D.R.S. AGENCY. D.R.S. AGENCY waiver sent on 10/16/2023, answer due 12/15/2023. (HERRMANN, JENNIFER) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by ANDREW B. ADAIR on behalf of NINE M. HENNE, RACHEAL KERPER, LOUIS R. RIZZUTO with Jury Demand & Certificate of Service(ADAIR, ANDREW) |
| Document #11 Mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff: Benjamin L. Warrick, Jr. (DT) |
| Document #11 Mailed to Unrep Parties: Nine M. Henne, Jayme Lynn Johnson, Racheal Kerper, Louis R. Rizzuto. (DT) |
Filing 11
ORDER OF 11/7/23 THAT DRS AGENCY IS FILE ITS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. ETC. SIGNED BY JUDGE: JOHN M. GALLAGHER ON 11/7/23. 11/7/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (DT) (COPY NOT MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF, UNREP PARTIES) Modified on 11/7/2023 (dt). Modified on 11/8/2023 (dt).
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss in Lieu of Answer filed by D.R.S. AGENCY, SCOTT E. LASH.Brief in Support and Certificate of Service.(HERRMANN, JENNIFER) |
| PAPER #8, #9 MAILED TO PRO SE (JL) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued on Amended Complaint as to NINE M. HENNE, JAYME LYNN JOHNSON, RACHEAL KERPER, LOUIS R. RIZZUTO. Forwarded To: Pro Se Plaintiff Benjamin L. Warrick, Jr. on 10/31/23. (DT) Modified on 11/1/2023 (lisad, ). |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against D.R.S. AGENCY, JAYME LYNN JOHNSON, RACHEAL KERPER, LOUIS R. RIZZUTO, NINE M. HENNE, SCOTT E. LASH, filed by BENJAMIN L. WARRICK, JR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EXHIBIT 1 PAGES 1-30, #2 Exhibit EXHIBIT 1 PAGES 31-65, #3 Exhibit EXHIBIT 2 PAGES 1-25, #4 Exhibit EXHIBIT 2 PAGES 26-50, #5 Exhibit EXHIBIT 2 PAGES 56-75, #6 Exhibit EXHIBIT 2 PAGES 76-100, #7 Exhibit EXHIBIT 2 PAGES 101-122)(dt) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by JENNIFER Pa HERRMANN on behalf of D.R.S. AGENCY, SCOTT E LASH with Certiicate of Service(HERRMANN, JENNIFER) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to D.R.S. AGENCY, NINE M HENNE, JAYME LYNN JOHNSON, RACHEL KERPER, SCOTT E LASH, LOUIS RIZZUTO. Mailed To: BENJAMIN L. WARRICK, JR. on 10/3/23 (er) |
| Filing 5 Filing fee: $ 402., receipt number 50000216 (er) |
| Document #4 Mailed to Pro Se Plainitff: Benjamin L. Warrick, Jr. (DT) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF 9/26/23 THAT PLAINITFF'S BENJAMIN L. WARRICK, JR'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (ECF NO. 1) IS DENIED. ETC. SIGNED BY JUDGE: JOHN M. GALLAGHER ON 9/26/23. 9/26/23 ENTERED. (DT) (COPY NOT MAILED TO PRO SE)
|
| Consent to E-Mail forms Mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff Benjamin L. Warrick, Jr. (DT) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES. (DT) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against D.R.S. AGENCY, NINE M HENNE, JAYME LYNN JOHNSON, RACHEL KERPER, SCOTT E LASH, LOUIS RIZZUTO, filed by BENJAMIN L. WARRICK, JR.(DT) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION OF PRO SE PLAINTIFF BENJAMIN L. WARRICK, JR., TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS. (DT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
