GARCIA v. READING POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
ALBERTO J. GARCIA, JR. |
READING POLICE DEPARTMENT, RDG POLICE OFFICER CRISTIAN MOROR, RDG POLICE OFFICER MS. SUPER, FAUST and GERY |
5:2023cv04908 |
December 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
PAUL S DIAMOND |
Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Filing fee: $ 7.80, receipt number 20017166 (jaa, ) |
DOC 6 ALONG WITH USM 285 FORM MAILED TO PRO SE (rf, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. ALBERTO J. GARCIA, JR., #2202-0501, SHALL PAY THE FULL FILING FEE OF $350 IN INSTALLMENTS REGARDLESS OF THE OUTCOME OF THIS CASE. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO THE WARDEN OF THE BERKS COUNTY JAIL. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE CASE SHALL PROCEED AT THIS TIME TO SERVICE BY THE U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE AGAINST THE FOLLOWING DEFENDANTS: READING POLICE DEPARTMENT; READING POLICE OFFICER CRISTIAN MOROR; READING POLICE OFFICER MS. SUPER; READING POLICE OFFICER FAUST; READING POLICE OFFICER GERY. IN ANTICIPATION OF SERVICE BY THE U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE, THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO GARCIA TOGETHER WITH ONE COPY OF THE U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE OF PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN FORM USM-285, FOR EACH DEFENDANT LISTED IN PARAGRAPH FIVE OF THIS ORDER. THE CLERK OF COURT IS FURTHER DIRECTED TO NOTE THE MAILING ON THE DOCKET. TO PROCEED WITH SERVICE, GARCIA MUST COMPLETE A USM-285 FORM FOR EACH DEFENDANT LISTED IN PARAGRAPH FIVE AND RETURN THE COMPLETED FORM(S) TO THE CLERKS OFFICE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. SERVICE CANNOT BE MADE BY THE U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE UNTIL GARCIA COMPLETES AND RETURNS THESE FORMS. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO DOCKET ANY USM-285 FORMS THAT GARCIARE TURNS IN THIS CASE. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED NOT TO ISSUE SUMMONSES AT THIS TIME. THE COURT WILL DIRECT ISSUANCE OF SUMMONSES UPON RECEIPT OF PROPERLY COMPLETED USM-285 FORMS. FURTHER INFORMATION AND DEADLINES OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 1/18/24.1/19/24 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(amas) |
DOC. NO. #6 FAXED TO THE WARDEN OF BERKS COUNTY ON 1/19/24. (amas) |
Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by ALBERTO J. GARCIA, JR. (envelope attached) (DT) |
Filing 4 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF HAVING FAILED TO FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT, AS REQUIRED, PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS CANNOT BE ADJUDICATED AT THIS TIME. PLAINTIFF SHALL, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT. ALTERNATIVELY PLAINTIFF CAN PROCEED BY SUBMITTING $405 TO THE CLERK OF COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. IF PLAINTIFF FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, THE CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY GEORGE V WYLESOL, CLERK OF COURT ON 12/15/23. 12/18/23 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED.(DT) Modified on 12/27/2023 (afm). |
Doc. 3 mailed to pro se. (er) |
Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (DT) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against FAUST, GERY, CRISTIAN MOROR, READING POLICE DEPARTMENT, MS. SUPER, filed by ALBERTO J. GARCIA, JR. (IFP PENDING) (ENVELOPE ATTACHED) (DT) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION OF PRO SE PLAINTIFF ALBERTO JOBES GARCIA, JR., TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS. (DT) (ENVELOPE ATTACHED) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.