ONLEY v. OMALLEY
| MEGAN (QUINN) ONLEY |
| MARTIN J. OMALLEY |
| 5:2024cv00427 |
| January 30, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOSE R ARTEAGA |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF MEGAN ONLEY IS DEEMED TO HAVE CONSENTED TO THE JURISDICTION OF A MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND THE ASSIGNED MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILL EXERCISE JURISDICTION FOR ALL PURPOSES UNDER 28 U.S.C. & 636 (c); ETC.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOSE R. ARTEAGA ON 2/29/24. 2/29/24 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE THE FORM ON OR BEFORE 2/28/23; ETC.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOSE R. ARTEAGA ON 2/21/24. 2/21/24 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL)
|
| Filing 7 Procedural Order 2/7/24 Entered and copies e-mailed. (JL) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SERVE THE COMPLAINT IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 3 OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR SOCIAL SECURITY ACTIONS UNDER 42 U.S.C. & 405 (g) BY ELECTRONIC MEANS VIA CM/ECF; ETC.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOSE R. ARTEAGA ON 2/7/24.2/7/24 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by MEGAN (QUINN) ONLEY..(MARZZACCO, CHRISTOPHER) |
| Service made electronically as to the Commissioner of Social Security and the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. (JL) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE BECAUSE IT DOES NOT APPEAR THAT ONLEY IS INCARCERATED. SHE SHALL EITHER FILE A RENEWED APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS OR PAY THE $405 TO THE CLERK BY 2/7/24; ETC.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOSE R. ARTEAGA ON 1/31/24.1/31/24 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL)
|
| Set/Reset Scheduling Order Deadlines: MOTIONS DUE BY 2/7/2024. (JL) |
| Filing 3 Social Security Notice of Case Assignment (Attachments: #1 Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge)(dt) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Megan Onley..(MARZZACCO, CHRISTOPHER) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MARTIN J. OMALLEY, filed by Megan Onley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Case Management Track Form, #3 Designation Form, #4 Exhibit UFD from ALJ, #5 Exhibit AC Denial of Request for Review)(MARZZACCO, CHRISTOPHER) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: ONLEY v. OMALLEY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MEGAN (QUINN) ONLEY | |
| Represented By: | CHRISTOPHER J. MARZZACCO |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MARTIN J. OMALLEY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
