ROHRBACH v. MCGINLEY et al
Petitioner: ROBERT ROHRBACH
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT THOMAS MCGINLEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case Number: 5:2024cv00911
Filed: February 28, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: CHAD F KENNEY
Referring Judge: CRAIG M STRAW
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 27, 2024 Filing 6 State Court record received from Court of Common Pleas of BERKS County. (Attachments: #1 2, #2 3, #3 4, #4 5, #5 6, #6 7, #7 8, #8 9, #9 10, #10 11, #11 12, #12 13, #13 14, #14 15, #15 16, #16 17, #17 18, #18 19, #19 20, #20 21, #21 22, #22 23, #23 24, #24 25, #25 26, #26 27, #27 28, #28 29, #29 30, #30 31, #31 32, #32 33, #33 34, #34 35, #35 36, #36 37, #37 38, #38 39, #39 40, #40 41, #41 42, #42 43, #43 44, #44 45, #45 46, #46 47, #47 48, #48 49, #49 50, #50 51, #51 52, #52 53, #53 54, #54 55, #55 56, #56 57, #57 58, #58 59)(jaa, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/27/2024: #59 60, #60 61, #61 62, #62 63, #63 64, #64 65, #65 66, #66 67, #67 68, #68 69, #69 70, #70 71, #71 72, #72 73, #73 74, #74 75, #75 76, #76 77, #77 78, #78 79, #79 80, #80 81, #81 82, #82 83, #83 84, #84 85, #85 86, #86 87, #87 88, #88 89, #89 90, #90 91, #91 92, #92 93, #93 94, #94 95, #95 96, #96 97, #97 98, #98 99, #99 100, #100 101, #101 102, #102 103, #103 104, #104 105, #105 106, #106 107, #107 108, #108 109, #109 110, #110 111) (jaa, ). (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/27/2024: #111 112, #112 113, #113 114, #114 115, #115 116, #116 117, #117 118, #118 119, #119 120, #120 121, #121 122, #122 123, #123 124, #124 125, #125 126, #126 127, #127 128, #128 129, #129 130, #130 131, #131 132, #132 133, #133 134, #134 135, #135 136, #136 137, #137 138, #138 139, #139 140, #140 141, #141 142, #142 143, #143 144, #144 145, #145 146, #146 147, #147 148, #148 149, #149 150, #150 151, #151 152, #152 153, #153 154, #154 155, #155 156, #156 157, #157 158, #158 159, #159 160, #160 161, #161 162, #162 163, #163 164, #164 165, #165 166, #166 167, #167 168, #168 169, #169 170, #170 171, #171 172, #172 173, #173 174, #174 175, #175 176, #176 177, #177 178, #178 179, #179 180, #180 181, #181 182, #182 183, #183 184, #184 185, #185 186) (jaa, ). (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/27/2024: #186 COVER LETTER) (jaa, ).
March 18, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER THAT DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BERKS COUNTY SHALL FILE SPECIFIC AND DETAILED ANSWER WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. THE PROTHONOTARY, CLERK OF COURT, OR OFFICE OF JUDICIAL SUPPORT OF BERKS COUNTY SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK OF THIS COURT COPIES OF ALL RECORDS, INCLUDING TRANSCRIPTS OF NOTES OF TESTIMONY AT ARRAIGNMENT, TRIAL, SENTENCING, SUPPRESSION HEARINGS, POST CONVICTION HEARINGS, PETITIONS, PLEADINGS, OPINIONS AND BRIEFS OF STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF COMMONWEALTH V ROHRBACH, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BERKS COUNTY,CP-06-CR-0004178-2016 WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE CRAIG M. STRAW ON 3/18/24. 3/18/24 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE. COPY OF ORDER EMAILED TO DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BERKS COUNTY & COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BERKS COUNTY & ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA(rf, )
March 15, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER THAT CASE IS REFERRED TO HONORABLE CRAIG M. STRAW FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO PROVIDE BERKS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE AND THE PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE AT ATTORNEY GENERAL WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 3/15/24. 3/18/24 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE. *COPY MAILED TO BERKS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE AND PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL*(rf, )
March 5, 2024 Filing 3 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 20018072 (sbt)
February 28, 2024 Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE: GUIDELINES MAILED TO PRO SE (rf, )
February 28, 2024 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by ROBERT ROHRBACH. *NO IFP. NO FEE PAID* (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(rf, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ROHRBACH v. MCGINLEY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ROBERT ROHRBACH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT THOMAS MCGINLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?