INMAN LANCASTER FOODSERVICES GROUP v. CFS CARDINAL MEDICAL MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
| INMAN LANCASTER FOODSERVICES GROUP |
| CFS CARDINAL MEDICAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, CARDINAL MEDICAL CENTER OF LANCASTER LLC and CARDINAL MEDICAL MANAGEMENT OF PENNSYLVANIA, LLC |
| 5:2024cv01103 |
| March 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CARDINAL MEDICAL CENTER OF LANCASTER LLC, CARDINAL MEDICAL MANAGEMENT OF PENNSYLVANIA, LLC, CFS CARDINAL MEDICAL MANAGEMENT, LLC ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number APAEDC-17328003.), filed by INMAN LANCASTER FOODSERVICES GROUP. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D)(WOLF, STEPHEN) |
| Attorneys are required by local rule to complete and file both a Civil Cover Sheet and a Designation Form. DEFENDANT's counsel is directed to file COMPLETED DESIGNATION FORM in this case using the Notice (Other) docket event located in the Notices category. The Yes/No questions and Certification Question asking if the case is/is not related need to be answered. A signature is also needed. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
