Christopherson v. Gourley et al
Charles Christopherson |
MR. MICHAEL GOURLEY and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL |
5:2024cv01343 |
March 29, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
KAI N SCOTT |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (sbt) |
Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Pennsylvania Middle; Case Number 3:24-cv-00528. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
DOC. NO. #5 MAILED TO PRO SE ON 4/1/24. (amas) |
Filing 3 (THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER) directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 3/28/2024. (Attachments: #1 IFP (Habeas Corpus)) (ea) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Middle on 4/1/2024.] |
Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 AO 85 Notice & Consent) (ea) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Middle on 4/1/2024.] |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Charles Christopherson. (ea) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Middle on 4/1/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.