DONG v. JADDOU et al
| SHENG FENG DONG |
| Director UR M. JADDOU, Director KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, U.S. Attorney JACQUELINE C ROMERO and ATTY. GENERAL MERRICK B. GARLAND |
| 5:2024cv01642 |
| April 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOHN M GALLAGHER |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE by SHENG FENG DONG (HENRY, TODD) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, UR M. JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JACQUELINE C ROMERO, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General Forwarded To: Counsel on 4/19/24 (er) (Main Document 2 replaced on 4/19/2024) (er). (Main Document 2 replaced on 4/19/2024) (er). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number APAEDC-17411331.), filed by SHENG FENG DONG. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Designation Form)(HENRY, TODD) |
| Attorneys are required by local rule to complete and file both a Civil Cover Sheet and a Designation Form. PLAINTIFF's counsel is directed to file in this case using the Notice (Other) docket event located in the Notices category. Civil Box was not checked off. (sbt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
