SAUERWINE v. HOLIHAN et al
| BRIAN SAUERWINE |
| GAVIN P. HOLIHAN and RICHARD COBLE |
| 5:2024cv01904 |
| May 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF HAVING FAILED TO FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT, AS REQUIRED, PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS CANNOT BE ADJUDICATED AT THIS TIME. PLAINTIFF SHALL, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT. ALTERNATIVELY PLAINTIFF CAN PROCEED BY SUBMITTING $405 TO THE CLERK OF COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. IF PLAINTIFF FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, THE CASE MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. SIGNED BY GEORGE V WYLESOL, CLERK OF COURT ON 5/9/24. 5/9/24 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(er)
|
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (dt) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by PRO SE PLAINTIFF BRIAN SAUERWINE.CERTIFICATION.(ENVELOPE ATTACHED) (DT) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RICHARD COBLE, GAVIN P. HOLIHAN, filed by PRO SE PLAINTIFF BRIAN SAUERWINE. (ENVELOPE ATTACHED) (DT) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
