Kvitka et al v. The Puffin Company, L.L.C. et al
| 1:2006cv00858 |
| April 25, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Sylvia H. Rambo |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the motions for sanctions (Docs. 88 and 90) are denied. See order for further details. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 8/21/09. (aaa )
|
|
Filing
85
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying Motion for Leave to file an interlocutory Appeal 80 Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 3/24/09 (ma, )
|
|
Filing
76
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part dfts' spoliation mtn: (1) Pltfs complaint 1 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.(2) At the time of trial, the court will instruct the jury as to the properadverse inference charge they may draw from Pltfs destruction of the oldlaptop and will bar Pltfs from arguing that individuals have tampered with thepaper copies of emails possessed by Dfts.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 2/13/09 (ma, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kvitka et al v. The Puffin Company, L.L.C. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
