Sinclair L.D. Johnson International, Inc. et al v. Faulkner Nissan, Inc.
| 1:2006cv02256 |
| November 21, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Christopher C. Conner |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
ORDER re: report of the magistrate judge 86 - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Report of the magistrate judge 86 is ADOPTED.; 2. Defendant's motion for summary judgment 52 is GRANTED.; 3. Clrk of Ct to entere JUDGMENT in favor of deft & against pltfs on all claims.; 4. Clrk of Ct directed to CLOSE case. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 03/09/10. (ki)
|
|
Filing
86
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Court enter an order granting Defendants motion for summary judgment 52 , enter judgment in Defendants favor, and close the case. Objections to R&R due by 2/15/2010Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on January 27, 2010. (kjn )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sinclair L.D. Johnson International, Inc. et al v. Faulkner Nissan, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
