Sash v. Hogsten et al
| Eliot S. Sash |
| Victor Factora, James Potope and Dr. James Brady, M.D. |
| 1:2007cv00475 |
| March 14, 2007 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Union |
| Thomas M. Blewitt |
| Sylvia H. Rambo |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: 1) The court adopts the report and recommendation 105 of MJ Blewitt.2) Pltfs mtn for sum jgmnt is denied.3) Dfts mtn for sum jgmnt 85 is granted.4) The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of DftsBrady, Potope and Factora with regard to Pltfs Eighth Amendment claimand against Pltf Sash and close the file.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 2/2/09 (ma, )
|
|
Filing
105
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS RECOMMENDED that Deft's Summary Judgment Motion (Doc 85) be granted. It is further recommended that judgment be entered in favor of Defts Potope, Brady and Factora, and against plf Sash. Additionally, it is rec ommended that Plf's Doc 86 Motion requesting the dismissal of Defts' Summary Judgment Motion be denied. NOTICE; Exceptions to be filed within l0 days. Objections to R&R due by 12/12/2008Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Blewitt on 11/24/08. (jb, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
