Cramer v. Superintendent of SCI Huntingdon et al
Petitioner: Derrick Cramer
Respondent: Superintendent of SCI Huntingdon, District Attorney For York County Pennsylvania and Attorney General for the State of Pennsylvania
Case Number: 1:2007cv00496
Filed: March 16, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Harrisburg Office
County: Adams
Presiding Judge: EC
Presiding Judge: Yvette Kane
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 42 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1)The petition for writ of habeas corpus is not subject to equitable tolling and is dismissed as untimely; 2)Petitioner's motion to amend/correct the habeas petition is denied as moot; 3)There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability; & 4)The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on 12/7/12. (dh)
July 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petnr's Mtn for Counsel is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 2)W/i 20 days from the date of this order, Petnr shall file a memo setting forth his arguments in support of equitable tolling in this matter. 3)Within 14 days for the filing of Petnr's memo, respondents shall file a response thereto. 28 24 Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on July 7, 2011. (sc)
June 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 24 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Derrick Cramer is DENIED without prejudice. Within 20 days of this order, Petnr shall file a memorandum setting forth his arguments in support of equitable tolling in this matter. 3)Within 14 days of that memo, respondents shall file a response thereto. Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on June 6, 2011. SEE ORDER. (sc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cramer v. Superintendent of SCI Huntingdon et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Derrick Cramer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Superintendent of SCI Huntingdon
Represented By: Hugh Stanley Rebert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: District Attorney For York County Pennsylvania
Represented By: Hugh Stanley Rebert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General for the State of Pennsylvania
Represented By: Hugh Stanley Rebert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?