Fato v. Vartan National Bank et al
| Frank Fato |
| Vartan National Bank, Vartan Financial Corporation, The Vartan Group and Centric Bank |
| 1:2007cv01291 |
| July 16, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Dauphin |
| Christopher C. Conner |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying defendant's motion to dismiss 20 plaintiff's complaint. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 01/06/09. (ki)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER construing OCC's motion 30 as motion to vacate Para 1 of 9/5/08 ct order 29 & GRANTING as so construed, and VACATING Para 1 of said order 29 w/out prejudice to pltf's rt to re-file a motion to compel upon demonstration that pltf complied w/ governing admin disclosure regs. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 10/01/08. (ki )
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER re: non-party motion of OCC for stay or order 29 - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Para 1 of 9/5/08 order of ct 29 is STAYED pending disposition of OCC's motion for stay 30 .; 2. Pltf instructed to submit br in opp to OCC's motion 30 by 9/30/08 - failure to do so will result in OCC's motion being granted as unopposed. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 09/16/08. (ki)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
