ROBINSON v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
| Joyce Robinson |
| Norfolk Southern Corp., Norfolk Southern Railroad Corp., John Does (1-10) and ABC Corporation (1-10) |
| 1:2007cv01641 |
| September 6, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Outside State |
| Yvette Kane |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 1)Dft's Mtn for Sum Jgm is GRANTED as to Pltf's Title VII termination claim, and that claim is DISMISSED. 2)SumJgm has been rendered to Dfts as to all of Pltf's clms. Therefore the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on Sept. 28, 2010. (sc)
|
|
Filing
99
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the 1)Dft's 69 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Pltf's Title VII clms for discrimination in the course of her employment is DENIED. 2)Dft's mtn for Sumjgm as Pltf's hostile work environ ment clm on the basis of her race is DENIED. 3)The case will be STAYED for 30 days to allow the parties to brief the Ct on whether pltf has exhausted her remedies before the PHRC and the EEOC as to pltfs Title VII Termination clm. 4The remainder of dfts mtn for sumjgm is GRANTED. The balance of pltf's clms will be DISMISSED. 5)Jgm is deferred. Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on Oct. 22, 2009. (sc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
