Levi v. Lappin et al
| Bernard S. Levi |
| Harley Lappin, Scott Dodrill, Harold Watts, Karen Hogsten, Jeffrey Raleigh, D. Nau, C. McIntyre, D. Ferry, Rancks, K. Fegers and B. Krakowski |
| 1:2007cv01839 |
| October 9, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Adams |
| Thomas M. Blewitt |
| Sylvia H. Rambo |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
141
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1) The court adopts the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Blewitt. 2) Defendants' motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff's First Amendment claim of mail tampering and the re taliation claim is granted. 3) Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief is denied. 4) The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Defendants Hogsten, Raleigh, Ferry and McIntyre and against Plaintiff and close the file. 5) It is certified that any appeal from this order will be deemed frivilous and not taken in good faith.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 8/18/09. (aaa )
|
|
Filing
140
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 126 Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction. IT ISA HEREBY ORDERED THAT the magistrate judge's order of June 25, 2009 is AFFIRMED. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 8/17/09. (pw, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
