Mandel Tobacco Company, Inc. v. The Hershey Company et al
| Mandel Tobacco Company, Inc. |
| The Hershey Company, Hershey Canada Inc., Mars, Inc., Masterfoods USA, Mars Canada Inc., Nestle S.A., Nestle USA, Nestle Canada Inc. and ITWAL Ltd. |
| 1:2008cv00122 |
| January 18, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Dauphin |
| Yvette Kane |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 15 Antitrust Litigation |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (re: multiple motions to dismiss: It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The motions to dismiss 471, 473 & 474 pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) by Mars Canada, Nestle SA & Nestle Canada are GRANTED.; 2. Motion to dismiss 466 pursuant to Rule 12( b)(2) by Cadbury plc & Cadbury Holdings DENIED.; 3. Motion to dismiss 469 amended complaints of indirect end users & indirect purchasers for resale pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) DENIED in part & DENIED as MOOT in part as follows... (see Paras 3a & 3b for specifics).; 4. Motion to dismiss 476 amended complaints of direct purchasers & individual pltfs pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) DENIED in part & DENIED as MOOT in part as follows... (see Paras 4a & 4b for specifics).; 5. Motion to dismiss 464 pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Cadbury plc & Cadbury Holdings DENIED. (See memo & order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 08/11/09. (jc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
