Chinniah et al v. East Pennsboro Township et al
| Ghana Chinniah and Suganthini Chinniah |
| East Pennsboro Township and Jeffrey S. Shultz |
| 1:2008cv01330 |
| July 14, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Cumberland |
| Yvette Kane |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
273
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS ORDERED that the 267 MOTION for New Trial filed by Ghana Chinniah is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 6/26/2014. SEE MEMORANDUM FOR DETAILS. (sc)
|
|
Filing
240
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendants omnibus motion in limine (Doc. No. 221) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. Defendants motion in limine to preclude Girish Modi from testifying is DENIED; 2. Defendants motion in limine to preclude Jonathan Greiner from testifying as an expert witness is GRANTED to the extent that Mr. Greiner will be allowed to testify solely as a fact witness; 3. Defendants motion in limine to ex clude Plaintiff Gnana Chinniahs handwritten annotations on certain photographs of East Pennsboro Township properties is GRANTED with the exception of any handwritten residential addresses on such photographs; 4. Defendants motion in limine to exclude any photographs of East Pennsboro properties taken in 2012 and 2013 is DENIED; 5. Defendants motion in limine to exclude Plaintiffs from introducing evidence or witnesses related to his Cumberland County tax dispute is GRANTED; 6. Defendants motion in limine to preclude Plaintiffs from conducting a jury view in East Pennsboro Township is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, becausePlaintiffs have since filed a separate motion for a jury view (Doc. No. 235) which shall be the subject of a separate order; 7 . Defendants motion in limine to exclude Plaintiffs from introducing any evidence obtained since the close of discovery or used to support Plaintiffs brief in opposition to Defendants motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 119) is DENIED; and, 8. Absent a showing at trial that evidence was destroyed, Plaintiffs are precludedfrom seeking a spoliation jury instruction or attempting to relitigate discovery disputes during trial. 221 Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on Nov. 15, 2013. (sc)
|
|
Filing
168
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the 162 Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on July 25, 2012. SEE MEMORANDUM FOR DETAILS. (sc)
|
|
Filing
161
ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION is ADOPTED. The Court will GRANT IN PART the Dft's 104 Motion for Summary Judgment as noted in order. 158 The Clerk is directed to reserve entry of jgm pending disposition of all remaining claims. IT IS ORDERED that a Telephone Conference is set for 6/28/2012 01:30 PM. Pltf's cnsl shall initiate the call. Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on June 5, 2012. (sc)
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED tha the Defendant's 16 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on March 12, 2009. (sc)
|
|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 5 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Pltf's are given leave to file an amended complaint by 12/8/08. Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on Nov. 17, 2008. SEE MEMORANDUM FOR DETAILS. (sc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
