Edward G. Rahll & Sons, Inc. v. Zach et al
| Edward G. Rahll & Sons, Inc. |
| Shawn Zach and Kim Zach |
| 1:2008cv01384 |
| July 23, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Agriculture Acts Office |
| Cumberland |
| Yvette Kane |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 07:499 Agricultural Commodities Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defts' contempt of court is PURGED.; 2. Proceedings STAYED pending completion of Shawn Zach's BR proceedings.; 3. Shawn Zach's BR cnsl to file quarterly status rpts apprising ct of progressio of BR proceedings - 1st rpt due 1/5/09...; 4. Clrk of Ct to mail & fax copy of order to Atty Gary Imblum.; 5. Clrk of Ct directed to CLOSE matter for stat purposes. (See order for complete details.)Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 12/10/08. (ki)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER re: ct's 11/20/08 order 35 & pltf's status rpt 38 - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. By 5:00 pm on 12/11/08, pltf's cnsl shall apprise ct of pltf's position re: recently produced docs... (see Para 1 for specific instruction s).; 2. Upon receipt of filing req'd by Para 1, ct may either enter order purging defts of contempt or take other action as it deems appropriate.; 3. Clrk of Ct directed to docket mat'ls transmitted to ct by deft's bankruptcy cnsl w/ certain of said docs to be SEALED. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 12/09/08. (ki)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER directing Clrk of Ct to docket fax from deft Zach as status rpt, noting fax adequately discharges obligation to inform ct of status of production efforts imposed upon deft Zach by Para 2b of order 35 of 11/20/08, & directing that, in event defts unable to complete production of docs by 12/4/08, they shall promptly notify ct in acc w/ Para 6 of order 35 . (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 12/03/08. (ki)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defts Shawn Zach & Kim Zach remain in contempt of ct...; 2. Defts may purge their contempt by... (see Paras 2a, 2b & 2c for specifics); 3. Deft Shawn Zach is commanded to perform following actions... (see Paras 3 a & 3b for specifics); 4. Upon receipt of docs id'd in Para 2a of order, pltf's cnsl shall file notice certifying that defts have discharged obligations..; 5. Failure to comply w/ provisions of this order may result in imposition of addt� 39;l contempt sanction upon defts.. (see Paras 5a-e for specifics); 6. If defts unable to satisfy obligations... shall promptly notify ct @ USDC Clrk's Office.; 7. Clrk of Ct to transmit coies of this order via cert mail to mx parties. (See order for complete details.)Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 11/20/08. (ki)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER re: preliminary injunction 19 & contempt hearing held this date - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defts may purge their contempt by supplying docs in Para 2 of prelim inj 19 to pltf's cnsl.... by 1/18/08. ; 2. Paras 1, 3 & 4 of prelim in j 19 are STAYED to extent they require defts to satisfy outstanding financial obligations subject to Shawn Zach's bankruptcy proceedings.; 3. Upon receipt of docs id'd in Para 1 of this order pltf's cnsl shall file notice certifying that defts have discharged obligations created hereunder... (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 11/10/08. (ki)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
