Perkins v. Staskiewicz et al
Kirk A. Perkins |
Charles A. Staskiewicz, John Brown and Jeffrey Miller |
1:2008cv01651 |
September 4, 2008 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Civil Rights: Other Office |
Cumberland |
Yvette Kane |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 28 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Charles A. Staskiewicz, John Brown, Jeffrey Miller is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to enter jgm in favor of dfts and close the case. Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on June 17, 2010. (sc) |
Filing 17 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 5 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1)Pltfs' malicious prosecution under the 14th Amendment is DISMISSED. 2)Pltfs' malicious prosecution under the 4th Amendment is NOT DISMISSED. 3)Pltfs' state law abuse of process and malicious prosecution clms against dfts Brown and Miller are DISMISSED. 4)Pltfs' state law abuse of process clm against dft Staskiewicz is DISMISSED. 5)Pltfs' state la w malicious prosecution clm against Dft Staskiewicz is NOT DISMISSED. 6)Pltf is given leave to amd his complt w/i 30 days. 7)Dfts' mtn to dismiss for failure of service of process is dismissed as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on March 13, 2009. SEE MEMORANDUM & ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS. (sc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.