Andrews v. Bureau of Codes Administration Office City of Harrisburg et al
Plaintiff: Delaine Andrews
Defendant: Bureau of Codes Administration Office City of Harrisburg, David Patton, Arden Emerick and Earl Diffenderfer
Case Number: 1:2008cv01669
Filed: September 8, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Civil Rights: Accomodations Office
County: Dauphin
Presiding Judge: Sylvia H. Rambo
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 128 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: (1) Dfts mtn for summary judgment 115 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:(A) GRANTED in all respects as to Dft Bureau of Codes;(B) GRANTED in all respects as to Dft David Patton;(C) GRANTED as to Pltfs Fourth Ame ndment unreasonable seizure and Fifth Amendment gvt deprivation claims;(D) DENIED as to Pltfs Fourth Amendment Equal Protection and Fourteenth Amendment Substantive Due Process claims.(2) Pursuant to footnote four in the accompanying memorandum, Pltf s Fourteenth Amendment Procedural Due Process claim is DISMISSED.(3) The clerk of court shall defer the entry of judgment until after trialin this matter.(4) The court will issue a separate order setting forth the remainingcase management deadlines for the balance of the case, including a trial date. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 02/24/12. (ma, )
June 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 80 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: (1) Pltfs mtn to compel discovery 73 is denied without prejudice;(2) Pltf and counsel for Dft shall meet face to face on or before 6/30/10 in a place that is mutually convenient for both parties. (3) Any discovery that the par ties agree is due shall be provided to Pltf by no later than 7/15/10. Dispositive Mtns & BrSupps 8/16/10; Mtns in Limine& BrSupps 10/11/10; Mtns in Limine Responses 10/21/10; Mtns in Limine Replies 10/28/10; Pretrial Memoranda 11/11/10; Pretrial Conference 11/18/10 at 2:00 p.m.Jury Selection/Trial Date 12/6/10. All other provisions of the original case management order remainunaltered. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 6/7/10. (ma, )
March 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 69 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part pltf's amended mtn to compel discovery 45 : Grandted as to doc request number 21. As to document request numbers 22, 23, and 24, Dfts are ordered to produce all citations that comply wit h those requests for the properties listed in Exhibit A to Pltfs request for production of documents. Denied in all other respects. It Is Further Ordered that pltf's mtn to enlarge discovery 59 : Discovery Ddl 4/15/10; Dispositive Mtns/brsups 5 /3/10; Mtns in Limine/brsups 7/6/10, Responses 7/16/10,Replies 7/23/10; Pretrial Memoranda, Proposed voir dire, & Proposed Jury Instructions 8/5/10; Pretrial Conference 8/12/10 at 1:30 p.m.Jury Selection/Trial 9/7/10 at 9:30 a.m.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 3/2/10 (ma, )
February 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 64 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: (1) Pltfs mtn to compel discovery, 42 , is DEEMEDMOOT; (2) Pltfs amended mtn to compel discovery, 45 , is DENIED IN PART, and DEFERRED IN PART, as follows:(a) The motion is DENIED as to Pltfs request for production of document s numbers 7, 9, and 19; and (b) A ruling on the remainder of Pltfs mtn isDEFERRED pending a hearing. Further, Dfts shall show cause, consistent with the discussion outlined in the attached memorandum, why the remainder of Pltfs mtn should not be granted. A hearing for this purpose will be held at 10:00 a.m. on 3/1/10, The parties shall come fully prepared to discuss the issued raised by the court in the attached memorandum. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 2/19/10 (ma, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Andrews v. Bureau of Codes Administration Office City of Harrisburg et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Delaine Andrews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bureau of Codes Administration Office City of Harrisburg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Patton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arden Emerick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Earl Diffenderfer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?