Masters v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Middle District Masters v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Inc.

Masters v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Earl L. Masters
Defendant:	Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Inc.
Case Number:	1:2008cv01872
Filed:	October 10, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Federal Employer's Liability Office
County:	Dauphin
Presiding Judge:	Christopher C. Conner
Presiding Judge:	J. Andrew Smyser
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	45:51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 1, 2010	Filing 125 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT of magistrate judge 87 , deft Norfolk Southern's motios to strike 73 & 75 & deft Arnold's motion to strike 77 are GRANTED in part & DENIED in part & Affidavit of Raymond Duffany is STRICKEN from record - in all other respects the motions are DENIED, MSJs filed by deft Arnold Logistics 55 & deft Norfolk Southern 57 are DENIED. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 12/01/10. (ki)
October 6, 2010	Filing 87 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS RECOMMENDED that the defendants motions to strike 73 75 and 77 be denied in part and granted in part. The affidavit of Raymond Duffany should be stricken, and the motions should otherwise be denied. It is re commended that the defendants motions 55 and 57 for summary judgment as to the plaintiffs claims against the defendants in the amended complaint be denied. Objections to R&R due by 10/25/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Andrew Smyser on 10/9/10. (Attachments: # 1 Notice)(rc)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 1, 2010

Filing 125 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT of magistrate judge 87 , deft Norfolk Southern's motios to strike 73 & 75 & deft Arnold's motion to strike 77 are GRANTED in part & DENIED in part & Affidavit of Raymond Duffany is STRICKEN from record - in all other respects the motions are DENIED, MSJs filed by deft Arnold Logistics 55 & deft Norfolk Southern 57 are DENIED. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 12/01/10. (ki)

October 6, 2010

Filing 87 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS RECOMMENDED that the defendants motions to strike 73 75 and 77 be denied in part and granted in part. The affidavit of Raymond Duffany should be stricken, and the motions should otherwise be denied. It is re commended that the defendants motions 55 and 57 for summary judgment as to the plaintiffs claims against the defendants in the amended complaint be denied. Objections to R&R due by 10/25/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Andrew Smyser on 10/9/10. (Attachments: # 1 Notice)(rc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Masters v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Earl L. Masters
Represented By:	Daniel R. Metschl
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?