Johnson v. Bladsoe
Petitioner: Rasheen Johnson
Respondent: Bryan Bladsoe
Case Number: 1:2008cv01989
Filed: November 3, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Adams
Presiding Judge: LQ
Presiding Judge: Yvette Kane
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 19, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Rasheen Johnson. FOR THE REASONS set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. The Clerk is directed to close this case.Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on 12/18/08. (pw, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Bladsoe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rasheen Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Bryan Bladsoe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?