Roy v. Continuing Care RX, Inc.
Plaintiff: Sajal Roy
Defendant: Continuing Care RX, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2008cv02015
Filed: November 6, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Dauphin
Presiding Judge: James M. Munley
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 41 MEMORANDUM and ORDER DENYING dft's objections [37; ADOPTING 36 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carlson; and DENYING 25 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 2/22/11 (sm, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roy v. Continuing Care RX, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sajal Roy
Represented By: Rufus A. Jennings
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Continuing Care RX, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?