Hookey v. Lomas et al
Megan Hookey |
Morrosa Lomas, Rhonda Hummel, Troy Edwards and James Sisley |
1:2008cv02284 |
December 22, 2008 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Adams |
AM |
Sylvia H. Rambo |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 91 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: In accordance with the accompanying memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1) The motion to set aside default as to Defendant Dalton (Doc. 86) is GRANTED and the Clerks entry of default (Doc. 85) as to Defendant Dalton is SET AS IDE. 2) The motion for default judgment (Doc. 87) is DEEMED MOOT. 3) The amended complaint (Doc. 25) is DISMISSED as to the remaining defendant, Defendant Dalton. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). 4) The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 5) Any appeal from this order is DEEMED frivolous and not in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 10/21/10. (pw, ) |
Filing 73 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting dfts' Motion to Dismiss 40 . Dfts David Deibler Gorman, Troy Edwards, Bill Frantz, Latisha Harvey, Rhonda Hummel, Marirosa Lamas, Brenda Rippey, George Sisley, and David Townshend are dismissed from this action.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 3/15/10 (ma, ) |
Filing 72 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying the motions for a transfer 9 , 17 , 34 Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 3/11/10 (ma, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.