Baker v. PPL Corporation
| Douglas Baker |
| PPL Corporation |
| 1:2009cv00428 |
| March 6, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| York |
| Christopher C. Conner |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
MEMORANDUM OPINION - Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, the Defendants Motion to Exceed Seven (7) Hours of Deposition Time, (Doc. 50), is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: The Defendant is granted leave to conduct a deposition of the Plaintiff of a duration of no more than 14 hours. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on May 12, 2011. (kjn )
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Court will convene a telephone conference with the parties on Monday, February 7, 2011, at 11:00 a.m. Defendants counsel shall be responsible for coordinating the conference call. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on January 27, 2011. (kjn )
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER re: report & recommendation of the magistrate judge 26 - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The report of the magistrate judge 26 is ADOPTED.; 2. Motion to dismiss &/or strike 9 complaint is GRANTED.; 3. Demand for punitive damages which pltf brought pursuant to PHRA is STRICKEN from complaint - pltf shall henceforth be precluded from seeking punitive damages pursuant to the PHRA.; 4. Demands for compensatory & punitive damages which pltf brought pursuant to anti-retaliation provisions of ADA are STRICKEN from complaint - pltf shall henceforth be precluded from seeking punitive damages pursuant to the PHRA; 5. Case REMANDED to magistrate judge for further proceedings. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 01/29/10. (ki) Modified on 1/29/2010 to complete docket entry (ki).
|
|
Filing
26
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - it is RECOMMENDED that the Court GRANT the defendants motion for dismiss or strikes the plaintiffs claim for compensatory and punitive damages under the anti-retaliation provision of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12203(a). (Doc. 9 .) Objections to R&R due by 1/22/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on January 5, 2010. (kjn )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Baker v. PPL Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Douglas Baker | |
| Represented By: | Rufus A. Jennings |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PPL Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
