Haynes v. At&T Mobility, LLC

Haynes v. At&T Mobility, LLC

Plaintiff:	Mikhail Haynes
Defendant:	At&T Mobility, LLC
Case Number:	1:2009cv00450
Filed:	March 11, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment Office
County:	Dauphin
Presiding Judge:	Christopher C. Conner
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	42:12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 8, 2011	Filing 33 ORDER ADOPTING in part & REJECTING in part the report of the magistrate judge 28 - a. rejected w/ re: conc that ct should deny summ jdgmt on failure-to-reassign claim reaised by pltf Mikhail Haynes & b. ADOPTED in all other respects.; 2. AT&T' s motion for summ jdgmt 15 .; 3. Clrk of Ct to enter jdgmt in favor of deft AT&T & against pltf Haynes on all claims.; 4. Clrk of Ct directed to CLOSE case. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 02/08/11. (ki)
November 17, 2010	Filing 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by At&T Mobility, LLC - For the reasons set forth above, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that the Court GRANT Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 15) with respect to Plaintiffs ret aliation claims and Plaintiffs claim that Defendant discriminated against him with respect to the provision of an adjustable desk and proximity to restroom facilities. It is further recommended that the Court DENY Defendants motion for summary judgm ent with respect to Plaintiffs claim that Defendant discriminated against him by failing to accommodate his medical needs by reassigning him to another position with the company for which he was qualified, but deny this motion without prejudice to th e parties further addressing this issue in light of our recommendation regarding the threshold legal issue of whether, and under what circumstances, a reassignment may qualify as a reasonable accommodation. Objections to R&R due by 12/6/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on November 17, 2010. (kjn)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 8, 2011

Filing 33 ORDER ADOPTING in part & REJECTING in part the report of the magistrate judge 28 - a. rejected w/ re: conc that ct should deny summ jdgmt on failure-to-reassign claim reaised by pltf Mikhail Haynes & b. ADOPTED in all other respects.; 2. AT&T' s motion for summ jdgmt 15 .; 3. Clrk of Ct to enter jdgmt in favor of deft AT&T & against pltf Haynes on all claims.; 4. Clrk of Ct directed to CLOSE case. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 02/08/11. (ki)

November 17, 2010

Filing 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by At&T Mobility, LLC - For the reasons set forth above, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that the Court GRANT Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 15) with respect to Plaintiffs ret aliation claims and Plaintiffs claim that Defendant discriminated against him with respect to the provision of an adjustable desk and proximity to restroom facilities. It is further recommended that the Court DENY Defendants motion for summary judgm ent with respect to Plaintiffs claim that Defendant discriminated against him by failing to accommodate his medical needs by reassigning him to another position with the company for which he was qualified, but deny this motion without prejudice to th e parties further addressing this issue in light of our recommendation regarding the threshold legal issue of whether, and under what circumstances, a reassignment may qualify as a reasonable accommodation. Objections to R&R due by 12/6/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on November 17, 2010. (kjn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haynes v. At&T Mobility, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mikhail Haynes
Represented By:	Scott M. Rothman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: At&T Mobility, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?