Stine v. Pennsylvania State Police, Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement
| Christopher L. Stine |
| Pennsylvania State Police, Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement |
| 1:2009cv00944 |
| May 19, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Dauphin |
| Christopher C. Conner |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
114
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 95) and Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 93) and all accompanying briefs, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants' Motion fo r Summary Judgment (Doc. 95) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 93) is DENIED. 3. Judgment is entered in FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS and AGAINST PLAINTIFF. 4. The Clerk of Court is hereby directed to CLOSE the case.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 3/21/12. (jfg)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of magistrate judge 78 & GRANTING defts' motion to dismiss 65 pltf's claims under Due Process Clause of 14th Amendment to extent that it seeks dismissal of substantive due process & DENIED to the extent that is seeks dismisal of claims for violations of procedural due process. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 05/25/11. (ki)
|
|
Filing
58
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Motions 21 , 42 & 50 are GRANTED: a. Motion 21 by Bureau GRANTED - Stine's claims against Bureau under 42 USC 1983, ADA & PHRA are DISMISSED - leave to amend denied as futile; b. Motion 42 by defts Backus, Asken, Facciolo, Hand, Butler, Coyle, Brown & Henry GRANTED - Stine's claims under 42 USC 1983 for alleged violations of rts under ADA, PHRA & 14th Amend Due Process Clause DISMISSED - w/ re:each of these claims except for Stine's due process claims leave to amend denied as futile - Stine's claims for damages against Pawlowski under 42 USC 1983 & ADA DISMISSEd - leave to amend deined as futile.; c. Motion 50 by defts Zerance, Bonney, Miller & Johnson GRANT ED - Stine's claims against these defts under 42 USC 1983 for alleged violations of rts under ADA, PHRA & 14th Amend Due Process Clause DISMISSED - w/ re: each of these claims except for due process claims leave to amend denied as futile.; 2. St ine permitted to file by 11/19/10 motion for leave to amend & br in supp to reassert 1983 claims against indiv-named defts for alleged violations of due process rts... (see Para 2 for specifics).; 3. Revised pretrial/trial schedule to issue by future order. (See memo & order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 11/02/10. (ki)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that the motion to dismiss 32 is DEEMED withdrawn. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 03/08/10. (ki)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER denying defendants' motion 8 to dismiss 1st amended complaint as MOOT. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 11/20/09. (ki)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stine v. Pennsylvania State Police, Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Christopher L. Stine | |
| Represented By: | Ira H. Weinstock |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pennsylvania State Police, Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
