Jamison v. Doe et al
| Sherell M. Jamison |
| John Doe, I, John Doe, II, City of York and Jane Doe |
| 1:2009cv01289 |
| July 6, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| York |
| Yvette Kane |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the Memorandum and Order dated 5/10/13, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that summary judgment be and is hereby entered in favor of Defendant, Trooper Keppel and against Plaintiff, Sherell M. Jamison. (jc)
|
|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all the claims against the City of York are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on Dec. 6, 2010. SEE MEMORANDUM FOR DETAILS.(sc)
|
|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE Court ADOPTS the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of MJ Smyser. The stay is lifted. 38 York City Defendants 15 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiff's clms against Deft Seelig are DISM ISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Deft is GRANTED leave to amend the complaint with respect to her claims against the City of York. Plaintiff shall submit an Amd Cmplt by 10/29/10. Defendant Keppel's 25 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Seelig terminated.Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on September 30, 2010. SEE MEMORANDUM FOR DETAILS. (sc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
