Mathias v. Kershaw et al
Shahnawaz Mathias |
Rhys Kershaw, Kevin Titzell and York County Adult Probation Department |
1:2009cv01515 |
August 7, 2009 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Harrisburg Office |
York |
Christopher C. Conner |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT of the magistrate judge 24 , GRANTING motion 18 to dismiss the amended complaint, & directing Clrk of Ct to CLOSE case. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 11/30/10. (ki) |
Filing 24 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 18 First MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by York County, Kevin Titzell, Rhys Kershaw, York County Adult Probation Department Objections to R&R due by 11/4/2010Signed by Magistrate Judge William T. Prince on 10/18/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Notice)(wtplc1, ) |
Filing 16 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defts' motion to dismiss 6 is GRANTED in part & DENIED in part.; 2. Motion GRANTED as to Count 2 of complaint.; 3. Count 2 DISMISSED with prejudice.; 4. Motion DENIED as to Count 1 of compla int.; 5. Pltf granted leave to amend complaint; 6. Pltf to file amended complaint w/in 21 days of date of this order.; 7. Pltf's failure to comply w/ this order may result in dismissal of this action. (See memo & order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 03/29/10. (ki) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.