E.N. v. Susquehanna Township School District et al
Plaintiff: E.N.
Defendant: Susquehanna Township School District, James Frank, Nancy Frank, Kermit Leitner, David W. Volkman, Sandie L. Pensiero, Randy Brenner and Judy Baumgardner
Case Number: 1:2009cv01727
Filed: September 4, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Harrisburg Office
County: Dauphin
Presiding Judge: Christopher C. Conner
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 149 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of Magistrate Judge Methvin 129 , GRANTING defts' MSJ 76 as to Count iII Section 1983 - right to privacy & DENYING defts' MSJ 76 in all other respects, & noting matter shall be scheduled for trial by separate order. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 08/16/11. (ki)
July 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 140 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Dfts motion for reconsideration, in camera inspection and entry of protective order (Doc. 131 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: 1. The motion is DENIED insofar as it seeks re consideration of the Courts prior order (Doc. 126 ) requiring Dfts to produce a copy of Dr. Buzoganys report to Pltf pursuant to Rule 35(b). 2.T he motion is GRANTED insofar as it seeks permission to produce a redacted copy of Dr. Buzoganys report to excise extraneous material not required to be produced pursuant to Rule 35(b). Within five days from the date of this order, Dfts shall produce a copy Dr. Buzoganys redacted report that is identical to the redacted copy Dfts provided to the Court for in camera review on July 15,2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on July 26, 2011. (kjn )
July 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 134 MEMORANDUM OPINION - Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, we will deny the parties request that we rule upon this motion in limine, a motion that Judge Conner has specifically deferred acting upon until after the summary judgment motion in this case is resolved. We enter this order, however, without prejudice to the renewal of this matter once the district court deems consideration of the motion to be appropriate. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on July 14, 2011. (kjn )
June 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 126 MEMORANDUM OPINION - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs motion to compel discovery pursuant to Rule 35(b) (Doc. 115 ) is GRANTED. Within seven days from the date of this order, Defendants shall produce a copy of Dr. Buzoganys draft report to Plai ntiff. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT to the extent Dr. Buzogany amends his draft report or prepares what Defendants deem to be a final report, Defendants shall promptly produce such amended or finalized report to Plaintiff without delay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on June 29, 2011. (kjn )
November 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 62 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: defts' motion to dismiss 19 - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Motion to dismiss 19 is GRANTED in part as follows... (see Paras 1a-h for specifics).; 2. Motion DENIED in all other respects.; 3. EN is GRANTED leave to fi le w/in 20 days of date of this order an amended complaint w/ re: her 14th Amendment privacy claims - if no such amended pleading is filed the instant matter will proceed on all remaining claims. (See memo & order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 11/23/10. (ki)
September 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Pltf shall submit to defts entries re: deft J. Frank from the journal @ issue.; 2. Pltf shall submit journal @ issue in its entirety to ct for in camera review...; 3. Parties to meet & confer & attempt to reach agreement re: production of certain confidential mat'ls for attys' eyes only... & if able to draft such agreement shall file through ECF... all recs determined by ct to be relevant will be produced to defts subject to terms of parties' conf agreement. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 09/20/10. (ki)
July 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. 7/1/10 order of ct 45 ... is VACATED & motion to compel discovery 43 shall be reinstated.; 2. By 8/25/10 defts shall file br in opp to pltf's motion to compel discovery 43 .; 3. Pltf may file reply br in supp of motion in acc w/ LR 7.7.; 4. Defts shall forthwith submit to the ct a privilege log & the docs @ issue for in camera review. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 07/14/10. (ki)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: E.N. v. Susquehanna Township School District et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: E.N.
Represented By: Wayne S. Melnick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Susquehanna Township School District
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Frank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy Frank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kermit Leitner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David W. Volkman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sandie L. Pensiero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Randy Brenner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Judy Baumgardner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?