M. v. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare et al
Harry M. |
Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare and Harriet Dichter |
1:2010cv00922 |
April 29, 2010 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Harrisburg Office |
Dauphin |
Yvette Kane |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 89 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 81 Motion for Attorney Fees and 82 Motion for Final Approval of the Proposed Settlement Agreement are GRANTED. Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on Aug. 21, 2013. SEE MEMORANDUM FOR DETAILS. (sc) |
Filing 77 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 1)Pltf's 73 Unopposed MOTION for Preliminary Approval of Settlement of Class Action is GRANTED except with respect to the proposed notice provisions; and 2)Pltfs are directed to submit an am d settlement agreement within 14 days of this order containing: proposed notification procedures for class members, the proposed publication scheme for class members who cannot be identified with reasonable efforts, and the form of the notice. Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on April 4, 2013. (sc) |
Filing 40 ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Pltf's 39 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery is GRANTED. Ddl is extended to 10/12/2011 for discovery. A Status Conference is set for 10/21/2011 at 9:30 AM.Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on July 13, 2011. (sc) |
Filing 25 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 19 Letter to Compel Discovery. NOW, on this 7th day of January 2010, upon consideration of Plaintiffs motion tocompel discovery (Doc. No. 19), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiffs motion to compel with respect to interro gatory responses referring to unspecified documents is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiffs motion to compel responses to Plaintiffs sixth and eleventh interrogatories is GRANTED. Plaintiffs motion to compel responses to Plaintiffs seventh and eighth interrogatori es is DENIED. 3. Plaintiffs motion to compel the disclosure of responsive documents of which Defendants are aware is GRANTED with the understanding that Defendants need not conduct additional searches beyond those required by the parties agreement an d the continuing disclosure requirements of Rule 26(e). 4. Plaintiffs motion to compel the disclosure of further clarifying information regarding potential defense witnesses is GRANTED. 5. Plaintiffs motion to compel the disclosure of certain documents within ten days is DENIED. All paper documents SHALL be disclosed on a rolling basis by March 21, 2011. Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on 1/7/11. (pw, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.