Ross v. Parole Board in Probation et al
| Glenn Bedford Ross |
| Parole Board in Probation, Chad Izlar, Cynthia Davis, David Durst, Bulkholder, Catherine McVey, Ruppert and Condo |
| 1:2010cv00926 |
| April 30, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Centre |
| Yvette Kane |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 34 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by David Durst, Billy Jo Rupert, Chad Ishler is GRANTED. The claims set forth against these dfts are DISMISSED in their entirety. The claims s et forth in the amdcmplt against Dfts PHS are DISMISSED w/o prejudice. Pltf's mtn for a restraining order is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 42 Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on Aug. 16, 2012. SEE MEMORANDUM FOR DETAILS. (sc)
|
|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1)Pltf's 29 MOTION to Strike the 19 MOTION to Dismiss is construed to be a supplement to Pltf's bropp. 2)Dft's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. 3)W/i 14 days, pltf shall file an amdcmplt. 5)Pltf's 14 MOTION for Summary Judgment is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on Sept. 7, 2011. SEE MEMORANDUM AND ORDER.(sc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
