Atlantic Circulation, Inc. et al v. Midwest Circulations, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Atlantic Circulation, Inc. and Daniel W. Shoemaker, III
Defendant: Midwest Circulations, LLC and Bridget Robbins
Case Number: 1:2010cv01368
Filed: July 1, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Harrisburg Office
County: York
Presiding Judge: William W. Caldwell
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 294 MEMORANDUM & OPINION - In conclusion, the Court finds that Defendant breached the Settlement Agreement's Moratorium provision six times by accepting subscription orders from Baker, Cowart, Nelson, Sheets, Fallin, and Rowe, Jr. Therefore, the Cou rt awards Plaintiffs $450,000 as agreed to by the parties in the Settlement Agreement -$75,000 for each breach. In turn, the Court awards nothing to Defendants because Plaintiffs did not breach when Stice agreed to purchase the contractual rights to Hayes and Smith from Robbins. In addition, the Court finds that neither side proved abreach of the Confidentiality provision of the Settlement Agreement and, therefore, awards no damages to either side. Finally, the Court awards no damages to either side on its tortious interference claims. Plaintiffs receive no damages because they have already succeeded on their breach of Moratorium claims, and awarding damages for tortious interference would be a double recovery. Defendants receive no damages because the evidence shows that Hayes initiated contact with Stice to inquire about joining his crew, Robbins waived her contractual rights to Hayes and Smith by entering an agreement to sell her rights to Stice, Shoemaker is not liable t o Robbins for Stice's non-payment under the agreement because Stice was not acting as Shoemaker's agent during the transaction, and there is no evidence that Stice took purposeful action to harm Robbins.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 11/20/12. (jfg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Atlantic Circulation, Inc. et al v. Midwest Circulations, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Atlantic Circulation, Inc.
Represented By: Shawn J. Lau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel W. Shoemaker, III
Represented By: Shawn J. Lau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Midwest Circulations, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bridget Robbins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?